Daily Mirror Northern Edition May 4th 2005


Southport Champion 28th July 2004 and 4th August 2004



Oldham Evening Chronicle - Wednesday, 06 April, 2005
Computer misuse claim against candidate Dawson.
THE Liberal Democrat candidate aiming to topple Oldham MP Phil Woolas is at the centre of a Parliamentary inquiry, the Chronicle can exclusively reveal today.
The Commissioner for Standards is investigating whether Tony Dawson was wrongly funded by the taxpayer and misused a computer as a full-time MP’s assistant in Southport.
The complaint, by a Southport constituent, follows a bitter falling-out between cross-party campaigners against the closure of the casualty department at a local children’s hospital.
Mr Dawson insisted the allegations had no serious substance and confidently predicted the independent commissioner would throw them out. But the inquiry will be a major embarrassment to the Liberal Democrats, who are aiming to overturn Mr Woolas’s slender 2,725 majority in the Oldham East and Saddleworth seat.
And with Tony Blair calling the General Election yesterday, the inquiry will be put on hold unless it is completed by the time Parliament is dissolved tomorrow.
The complaint has been made against Southport MP John Pugh, but concerns the activities of Mr Dawson as a contributor to an online chatroom dedicated to saving the A&E department.
The internet service provider barred Mr Dawson from the chatroom, after a series of messages that fellow contributors complained were offensive.
In one exchange, Mr Dawson wrote: “Which dumb, helpless animals would you like us to abuse besides donkeys? Abuse a donkey or two for me in an imaginative way, won’t you.”
The complaint alleges the aide wrongly sent messages while he was being funded, by the taxpayer, to carry out parliamentary work and on equipment provided for that purpose.
In a letter to the complainant seen by the Chronicle, Mr Dawson said he was prepared to apologise, but insisted he stood by his comments.
He told the Chronicle he got involved in the campaign as a concerned parent because his daughter lived close to the hospital.
The complainant was dragging up the issue again, according to Mr Dawson, having failed to put together a legal case for defamation — and after spurning two offers to discuss the matter.
He added: “I used my spare time to robustly criticise those who had damaged the campaign, in the face of a torrent of abuse from an anonymous ally of theirs.
“This is a very old story with no serious substance. I fully anticipate that the Parliamentary Commissioner will confirm that there is nothing to answer.”
Mr Woolas said: “This man is an aspiring MP but, as a staff member for an MP, he engaged in abusive language on a public forum. It’s not the behaviour the public should expect.”

MP will take legal action over ‘astonishing’ slurs.

Oldham Evening Chronicle - Tuesday, 12 April, 2005
Dawson inquiry ditched
A PARLIAMENTARY inquiry surrounding the conduct of an Oldham candidate has been thrown out. Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Sir Philip Mawer has decided there is no evidence that Southport MP John Pugh broke the code of conduct for members.
The complaint against the Liberal Democrat concerned his assistant Tony Dawson, who is standing against Labour’s Phil Woolas in the marginal Oldham East and Saddleworth seat. It claimed that Mr Dawson, as MP’s assistant, wrongly sent messages to a chatroom dedicated to saving a children’s hospital while he was being funded by the taxpayer for parliamentary work, and on equipment provided for that purpose.
The Internet provider barred Mr Dawson from the chatroom after a series of messages fellow contributors felt were offensive.
Mr Mawer’s spokesman confirmed a preliminary investigation had been carried out. She said: “The primary issue for the commissioner was whether Dr John Pugh had broken the code of conduct for members. The evidence available suggests that the answer to this was no.”
Mr Dawson said that he had been exonerated. He claimed the complaint had been brought by a former Labour candidate.
He added: “It is clear that my political opponents will stoop to any depths in order to avoid the pressing political issues of this area, in what is the closest parliamentary contest between Labour and Liberal Democrats in England.
“I have been subject in past months to a sustained set of personal attacks in the local press by both Labour and Conservative opponents, not one of which has come to any fruition.”

Oldham Evening Chronicle - Tuesday, 19th April, 2005
*Dawson facing election probe* Hillside Cottage in Dobcross — empty
HISTORY could be made today as the nomination papers of an Oldham General Election candidate are challenged at a special hearing.
Just hours before nominations are due to close for the forthcoming May 5 election, a Labour Party agent questioned the validity of Liberal Democrat candidate Tony Dawson’s papers.
Mr Dawson, the party’s candidate in Oldham East and Saddleworth, who works as as a consumer advocate, is also assistant to Southport Liberal Democrat MP John Pugh.
According to guidance notes given to all candidates and agents, the nomination paper must have the person’s full name as it appears on their birth certificate and their current home address written in full.
However, Joe Fitzpatrick, election agent for Labour candidate Phil Woolas, believes Mr Dawson has not completed the form correctly, using the name Tony, which he is known as rather than David Anthony as it appears on his birth certificate.
He also claims that Mr Dawson has never lived at Hillside Cottage, Nicker Brow, Dobcross — the address given on his nomination papers.
The house, which is owned by Mr Dawson’s election agent, Councillor Mike Buckley, has been empty since the last tenant died. And neighbours confirmed that the house has been unoccupied for around three years.
When a Chronicle photographer went to the house this morning, she found all the windows whitewashed.
This morning, a Labour Party representative handed over documentation questioning the validity of Mr Dawson’s papers to Returning Officer and the chief executive of Oldham Council, Andrew Kilburn.
In the 11th hour meeting, Mr Kilburn was expected to make an immediate decision on whether the nomination papers would be accepted or deemed invalid.
If the invalid claim is upheld by Mr Kilburn, the Liberal Democrats will be faced with the difficult decision of either choosing another candidate before today’s 4pm deadline or ensuring Mr Dawson completes another set of nomination papers with his correct details.
A Labour Party spokesman said: “Tony Dawson is on the electoral register at a house in Dobcross but we know he doesn’t live there.
If he uses that address on his nomination papers, we are asking the Returning Officer Andrew Kilburn to adjudicate on the validity of his nomination.” Mr Dawson currently appears on two electoral registers — one in Southport as David A Dawson and one in Oldham East as Tony Dawson.
He has already received his postal vote in Southport and the Labour Party are questioning why, if he says he lives in Oldham,he will be voting in Southport.
Criminal proceedings could follow if the Crown Prosecution Service decide that by completing incorrect details the candidate or his agent have committed fraud.

Oldham Advertiser
Election thrown into chaos
THE result of the marginal Oldham East and Saddleworth seat could face a legal challenge after Liberal Democrat candidate Tony Dawson’s nomination form was disputed by Labour during a day of high drama.
Acting returning officer Andrew Kilburn has confirmed that the nomination form submitted on Dawson’s behalf was valid “on its face” - in other words it is consistent with information in the electoral register.
But a council statement added that the returning officer has no authority to determine whether other particulars on the nomination form are correct and Kilburn also acknowledged to the Advertiser that the result of the ward election could be challenged.
“It would be for the courts to decide following the election should it be brought to their attention by an election petition,” he said.
Joe Fitzpatrick, agent for sitting Labour MP Phil Woolas, disputed Dawson’s candidacy on the grounds that, by law, nomination forms must state a candidate’s name as it appears on their birth certificate and provide their current home address.
Dawson’s nomination - which refers to Tony Dawson - differs from his birth certificate, which gives his name as David Anthony Dawson.
Labour also questioned the validity of the home address supplied, which was Hillside Cottage, Nicker Brow, Dobcross. The property has whitewashed windows and bare walls, planks of wood and tools and pots of paint on view inside.
But Dawson, who works as a consumer advocate and is also assistant to Southport MP John Pugh, hit back alleging a ‘dirty tricks’ campaign.
He said he had been living in one room of the house for the past three months and that neighbours would rarely see him as he commutes and often visited late at night.
He said: “This is a distraction from politics. The Liberal Democrats are clearly challenging Labour on all the issues and they want to talk about anything except the government’s record.”
Phil Woolas said: “What is clear is that the address on the nomination is an empty house. Conservative and Labour members of parliament alike are united in their distrust of Liberal Democrats who play the local card when they are no such thing. On this occasion they have been hoist with their own petard.
“The returning officer’s legal advice was that he cannot throw the nomination out, however he or any member of the public can ask for the matter to be referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions.”

Oldham Evening Chronicle - Wednesday, 20 April, 2005

Police check on Dawson nomination

Oldham Evening Chronicle - Friday, 6th May, 2005
Woolas heads Labour sweep
THE Labour flag continues to fly over Oldham this morning as the party prepares for an historic third term in power.
All three candidates successfully defended their seats, and Phil Woolas, a junior minister and staunch supporter of Tony Blair, even bucked the national trend in Oldham East and Saddleworth.
The constituency was a prominent Liberal Democrat target, but he beat off Tony Dawson’s challenge and increased his majority by 864.
Mr Woolas pledged to make Metrolink his priority, while Mr Dawson — who survived a Labour complaint that his Dobcross address was an empty house — said he had become part of the area’s Lib-Dem establishment and was here to stay.
Mr Dawson saw the Liberal Democrat vote cut from 14, 811 to 14,378 and said: “I am very disappointed, we had hoped to win here. It is the outcome of a deliberate and vicious smear campaign against me.”
The 50-year-old denied that that the failure of any top-ranking Lib-Dems to visit Oldham during the campaign was because they did not support him.
“We had a discussion early on in our campaign with our campaign committee. We felt on balance we would rather spend our time working with the people than doing media stunts.
“We brought the policies to the people and we won every debate we had,” he said.

Oldham Evening Chronicle - Friday, 6th May, 2005
Police probe allegation of postal vote fraud
POLICE and Oldham Council are investigating a new allegation of election fraud involving the theft of a couple’s postal ballot.
Kathleen Szulc (59), from Uppermill, was unable to vote yesterday at a Saddleworth polling station after being told she was marked down as having done so by post — despite never receiving her ballot form.
Her vote appears to have been illegally used by someone else.
Liberal Democrat councillor Richard Knowles, who accompanied Mrs Szulc and her husband, Frank (79), to the polling station, said someone had stolen her vote.
“Something has gone wrong. Whether it was just a human error I don’t know but at least one of these two votes has been used fraudulently.
“It isn’t something that I never thought would happen. Vote stealing is a serious issue.”
Oldham Council’s Chief Executive, Andrew Kilburn, acting returning officer, said: “Given the way it was reported to us we have concerns about the use of both votes and we are talking to the police at the moment about them.”
Supt Martin Bottomley confirmed that officers were working with the council to confirm whether or not Mr and Mrs Szulc’s votes had been fraudulently cast.

Manchester Evening News Friday 6th May 2005
But Mr Dawson, who came second after polling 14,378, said the Labour party had fought a rough and highly personal campaign. He said: "There has been a lot of mud-slinging. We have tried to fight on the policies and they've tried to fight the person.
"We have been fighting fair - fighting on the issues. It's very sad. That's the sort of campaign people want, but it's not what they've been given."
His campaign was hit hard by Labour claims that he had put false details on his nomination papers, but police cleared him of wrong doing after an investigation.
On polling day Mr Dawson contacted the police to complain about statements allegedly made by Labour about him during the election.